It’s easy to ski all day long, and it’s equal parts playful and carving charger. I have a lot of days on the Ranger 102 and its a very fun and versatile ski.
Sort of feel like the 102 fr might be the ski for me, butttt, I dont know, I do like stiffer skis generally, but im assuming the 102's would be more versatile in this two ski quiver. Although I live in VT, these skis will travel. Mostly at the resort with these but will have a 106 waist soft snow ski with shifts as well (ripstick or blaze). Last edited by SnakeMagnet 09-22-2021 at 10:56 PM.Ĭan anyone compare the ranger 99ti vs the 102 fr? I know the fr should be more playfull, but say there was a better deal on the 99ti, might you go with that? I'm 210lb 6'4". Besides that, calling the rustler a better fit for a 50/50 is about all the praise i'll ever give it. If anything saying a ski "Makes jerry think he's Candide/FWT/" is praise. Translating that to my experience with them, they felt too 'safe' and didn't let me push my limits in aspects other skis did, and with a swing weight and stiffness that denies a sense of playfulness. All I said was as you mentioned, the Enforcer is a compromise that agrees with everyone but is not a perfect fit for anyone looking to min-max their ski. Point out the shit-talking and i'll own it. I don't really think they should be considered here as others have stated. True they can't haul ass through choppy crud at 45 mph with impunity but for something so versatile they hold their own on the groomers at speed. I think they get the compromise about right. So you are taking a shit on the 104's because they are great skis that don't punish you for getting out of sorts? They are 100ish under and a compromise by design. So anyone can run them and feel good about their smaller wallet, but I guarantee they would be happier on something more in-tune with their ability and style.
High tail hall rip plus#
But it's a master-of-none deal, and they don't have a plus attribute to stand out above other damper skis like the Mantra, Ranger, or Rustler. Any tourist can strap in and feel invincible 'plowing' through chop at 15MPH without immediately eating shit in their permanent backseat, which is why they bloat the "performance rental" inventories on this continent (or at least the ones i've seen). Much as i'd suggest a enforcer as well while being a decent enough stick, they just feel 'dead' in the sense of being dead simple to use. The higher the ratio, the more it is a backcountry / skimo ski. The more it will feel like a tank with a good suspension. The lower the ratio, the more it is a piste ski with a lot of rubber, titanal, heavy wood, etc. The ratio of the two gives you an idea of its internal construction. but the tail stiffness is not as important).įinally, you can look at the base area (often related to float) vs its weight.
High tail hall rip full#
Note that these are average values, the full distribution might also influence the behaviour of the ski (e.g., torsionnaly stiff tips are great for edge hold on ice. if the tip/tail are up in the air, the ski will be playful and won't hold much). Torsional stiffness increases the precision / edge hold of a ski, but decreases it playfulness (but you also need to consider the rocker length to get the full picture.
High tail hall rip .exe#
Recent Searches interacial porm she has a pussy and a dick girls with great breasts gay fuck animal tube sexe intense 長澤あずさ big black maid jazmyn porn tporn tube alix.We typically think that increased bending stiffness will increase the speed limit of a ski (i.e., more pressure on the tip/tail, assuming the tip/tail touch the snow!) and also how much it snakes across the terrain or pushes you out of moguls.